Deconstructing Oppression in India: A Case for Anti-oppressive Social Work Practice

Authors

  • Andleeb Rather Department of Social Work, Aligarh Muslim University, India
  • Midhat Zaidi Centre for Jawaharlal Nehru Studies, Jamie Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, India

Keywords:

oppression, India, social exclusion, marginalization, social justice, Anti-Oppressive practice

Abstract

Oppression is largely understood as the systematic discrimination and exploitation of people based on their membership in a marginalized group. The oppressive dynamics are pervasive and function on various levels, from the interpersonal to the larger oppressive economic and political structures. India, like several other Asian countries, is afflicted with marginalization and social exclusion based on caste, religion, class and gender, fostering a system of widespread oppression. Social workers need to understand the dynamics of oppression to mitigate oppression at both micro and macro levels while simultaneously reevaluating and preventing their own complicity in perpetuating oppressive systems. Deriving from various radical social work approaches (anti-racist, feminist social work), the anti-oppressive framework offers a paradigm shift in professional social work. Anti-oppressive practice is emancipatory social work practice that aims to bring about structural and institutional changes and free people from vulnerabilities that current arrangements have imposed on them. The present paper explores the Anti-Oppressive approach to Social Work Practice within the Indian context. The paper argues that the Social Work profession must look beyond enhancing functioning and pursue the goal of social justice for all by confronting oppression.

References

Abramovitz, Mimi. (1998). Social Work and Social Reform: An Arena of Struggle. Social Work. 43. 10.1093/sw/43.6.512.

Adams, R., Dominelli, L., & Payne, M. (2009). Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates. 3rd edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan

Alam, J. (2008). The Contemporary Muslim Situation in India: A Long-Term View. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(2), 45-53. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from http://jmielibrary.informaticsglobal.com:2098/stable/40276902

Almeida, Rhea & Rozas, Lisa & Cross-Denny, Bronwyn & Lee, Karen & Yamada, Ann-Marie. (2019). Coloniality and Intersectionality in Social Work Education and Practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services. 30. 1-17. 10.1080/10428232.2019.1574195.

Burke B., Harrison P. (1998) Anti-oppressive practice. In: Adams R., Dominelli L., Payne M., Campling J. (eds) Social Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14400-6_19

Clifford, D.J. (1995) 'Methods in oral history and social work,' Journal of the Oral History Society 23 (2).

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. doi:10.2307/1229039

Dalrymple, J and Burke, B (1995) Anti-Oppressive Practice: Social Care and the Law. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Dominelli, Lena.(2002). Anti-Oppressive Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan. New York.

Dybicz, Phillip (2010) . Confronting oppression not Enhancing Functioning: The Role of Social workers within Postmodern Practice. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 37 : Issue. 1 , Article 3.

Essed, P (1991) Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. London: Sage.

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Freire, P (1974) Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury

Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.

Galtung, Johan (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research. Sage Publications, Ltd.6(3).pp 167-191. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422690. Accessed: 28-12-2020 .

Galtung, Johan, and Tord Höivik. “Structural and Direct Violence: A Note on Operationalization.” Journal of Peace Research 8 (1971): 173–176.

Jordan, B. & Jordan, C. (2000). Social work and the third way: Tough love as social policy. London: Sage Publications.

Mullaly, B. (2007). The new structural social work. Canada: Oxford University Press.

Okoli, R., Agwu, P & Okoye U. (2017). Anti-oppressive/discriminatory social work practice. In Okoye, U., Chukwu, N. & Agwu, P. (Eds.). Social work in Nigeria: Book of readings (pp 209–219). Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press Ltd

Pandya, A. (2010). Muslim Indians: Struggle for Inclusion (pp. 1-24, Rep.). Stimson Center. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from http://jmielibrary.informaticsglobal.com:2098/stable/resrep10953.6

Pierson, J (2002). Tackling social exclusion. London and New York: Routledge.

Rogers, J. (2012). Anti-oppressive social work research: Reflections on power in the creation of knowledge. Social Work Education, 31(7), 866-879.

Strier, Roni. (2006). Anti-Oppressive Research in Social Work: A Preliminary Definition. British Journal of Social Work. 1. 10.1093/jaw/bcl062.

Teater, B. (2010). Applying social work theories and methods. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Thompson, N. (2006). Anti-discriminatory practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wetzel, J W (1997) Human Rights and Social Work Practice. Paper delivered at the CSWE Annual Program Meeting, New York City, March 8.

Young, R (1990) White Mythologies: Writing History and the West. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

01.04.2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rather , A., & Zaidi , M. (2023). Deconstructing Oppression in India: A Case for Anti-oppressive Social Work Practice. Journal of Social Work Education and Practice, 7(3). https://jswep.bdtopten.com/index.php/jswep/article/view/140